Extracts

The following extracts are used to illustrate specific points on the other web pages, and are linked to them. They are grouped together here so that they can easily be compared with each other where relevant. They also illustrate the kind of information that can be extracted.The red arrows on the captions link back to the relevant web pages.

The development of the industry from 1811 to 1850
Figure 1: The development of the industry from 1811 to 1850
Production and export statistics between 1851 and 1870
Figure 2: Production and export statistics between 1851 and 1870
Production and export statistics between 1871 and 1894
Figure 3: Production and export statistics between 1871 and 1894
Production and export statistics between 1895 and 1913
Figure 4: Production and export statistics between 1895 and 1913
Production and export statistics between 1851 and 1913
Figure 5: Production and export statistics between 1851 and 1913
Production and export statistics between 1900 and 1938
Figure 6: Production and export statistics between 1900 and 1938
District relative importance for 1852
Figure 7.1: Relative importance of districts for 1852 (based on 221,979 barrels exported, which was 46% of all barrels produced)
Destination relative importance for 1852
Figure 7.2: Relative importance of destinations for 1852
District relative importance for 1870
Figure 8.1: Relative importance of districts for 1870 (based on 486,064 barrels exported, which was 58% of all barrels produced)
Destination relative importance for 1870
Figure 8.2: Relative importance of destinations for 1870
District relative importance for 1882
Figure 9.1: Relative importance of districts for 1882 (based on 782,576 barrels exported, which was 61% of all barrels produced)
Destination relative importance for 1882
Figure 9.2: Relative importance of destinations for 1882
District relative importance for 1912
Figure 10.1: Relative importance of districts for 1912 (based on 1,471,815 barrels exported, which was 72% of all barrels produced)
Destination relative importance for 1912
Figure 10.2: Relative importance of destinations for 1912
Compare Wick and Fraserburgh 1860-1878
Figure 11: Comparison of exports for Wick and Fraserburgh 1860-1878
Catch by vessel type
Figure 12: Percentage of the total catch by different types of vessel from 1906 to 1913. Chart is based on Page v of the Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland 32nd Report, 1913
Exports to empires 1885 to 1913
Figure 13: Exports to German and Russian Empires 1885 to 1913
Exports to St Petersburg and Libau 1885 to 1913
Figure 14: Comparison of Exports to St. Petersburg and Libau 1885 to 1913
Exports to Königsberg and Libau 1885 to 1913
Figure 15: Comparison of Exports to Königsberg and Libau 1885 to 1913
Exports to Stettin and St Petersburg 1900 to 1938
Figure 16: Comparison of Exports to Stettin and St Petersburg 1900 to 1938
Exports to Königsberg and Danzig 1900 to 1938
Figure 17: Comparison of Exports to Königsberg and Danzig 1900 to 1938
Kippering 1900 to 1938
Figure 18: Comparison of Kippering on the East Coast and the West Coast 1900 to 1938